Yesterday I took some image at dawn from my site just to check the reliability of the horizon profile generated by http://www.heywhatsthat.com and of Uruk_One itself, of course. The result, taking into account the unpredictability of the refraction data, looks pretty good to me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4c31/b4c31693e01d038a9c62428aafc62e112eac6ea0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77759/77759b4867247d57d2af433f418793b7eb081a93" alt=""
EDIT: I suspected that a calibration of the horizon profiles with respect to the theoretical horizon (where zenital distance is exactly 90°) should be needed. This time I’m very satisfied of matching with “real life” and just for further check I compared the result with Stellarium.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db2ff/db2ffa3f299d34da5ea5916cdc2795c0a8cf582c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f67e/8f67e8a40233daaabd2de4729e5f6b96dcb5115b" alt=""
Buonasera
Direi che il risultato ottenuto è ottimo.
Luigi
Beh, non posso lamentarmi in effetti. Nel frattempo ho modificato i 3 orizzonti in modo che disegnino sopra l’oggetto e non sotto, come appare adesso. Quello reale (azzurro), quello matematico (verde) e quello depresso (rosso).
saluti
Alberto